My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/20/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
6/20/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:28:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/20/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />JUN 2 01984 <br />BOOK - 57 't� J 511 <br />have to find a mechanism to enter into the contracts and <br />commit the County to $2.4 million, and at the same time <br />assure the County that the balance of the $871,000 will be <br />available should the assessment bonds fail. He felt there <br />were two ways to do this; <br />1) To go back to West County Utilities and ask them for a <br />letter of credit for their entire obligation of $2 -million <br />which would provide absolute assurance to the County. The <br />letter of credit would be written so that in the event the <br />assessment issue was not sold to Florida National Bank by <br />September 1, 1984, the County then would have the ability to <br />call down that letter of credit and use the $2 -million to <br />build the project. That would involve certain costs to the <br />utility and Attorney Brandenburg wasn't sure whether they <br />would want to do that. <br />2) Enter into a contract with West County Utilities and <br />their participating individuals that in the event the <br />assessment revenue bond issue is not in place and bought by <br />Florida National Bank, then each of them individually within <br />a 10 -day period will come up with their $970.45 per <br />equivalent residential unit that they have reserved. That <br />would produce the $2 -million which the County would need to <br />finish the contract. Under the contract, the County has an <br />agreement with them to come up with those funds. All the <br />developers want this project to go as their development <br />plans are contingent upon the project being completed, and <br />they originally agreed to come up with that money up front. <br />In either event, the developers are getting what they <br />bargained for, and the only thing they would be losing out <br />on is the interest break that the County has been trying to <br />benefit them with by virtue of assessment. <br />The County Attorney recommended the irrevocable letter <br />of credit. As an alternative, he reported that an agreement <br />is being prepared which should accomplish the second <br />48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.