My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
7/11/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Davis stated that staff would like to schedule <br />a public hearing to address this matter and would like to do <br />a drainage study of the Vero Lakes area and the surrounding <br />properties that would like to be included. There is an RV <br />(Recreation Vehicle) park on the east side of I-95 that <br />contributes drainage; they share a common outfall and their <br />drainage depends upon the system. Staff would like to go <br />ahead with an internal study of the Subdivision under the <br />Corps of Engineers "Small Project Program," which may take a <br />number of years to get established and approved, and at the <br />same time apply to the St. John's Water Management District <br />to address the outfall problems. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke to authorize <br />staff to set up a public hearing on an MSTU <br />for Vero Lake Estates, as discussed, preferably <br />in the evening. <br />Discussion ensued re the boundaries of the proposed <br />MSTU, and Director Davis informed the Board that Vero Lake <br />Estates Subdivision is about 2,400 acres and he believed <br />that plus the RV park site, which is contiguous, would <br />pretty much be the limits of the MSTU. The outfall, <br />however, affects a larger number of property owners and the <br />applications to the Corps and the Water Management District <br />should be on the basis of the MSTU plus the additional <br />property owners affected. Mr. Davis believed the County <br />could request the study and make application for it, and he <br />did not believe the property owners would object. <br />Some discussion ensued regarding whether the MSTU could <br />be in place by October, and Attorney Brandenburg noted that <br />the law as to when an MSTU must be in place in order to levy <br />88 <br />JUL 1 1 1994 BOOK 57 w ffl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.