7/18/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUL 18 1984 Boaz 57 FaCF 7033 Chief Planner Shearer reported that prior to this application being submitted, Planning & Zoning met with the owners to try to come up with a reasonable zoning scheme for this property that would be in everyone's best interests and they looked at several alternatives. The applicant had requested that the property on U.S.I be C-1, and the property in the rear be M-1; however, at the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing some potential problems came up, and they agreed to amend their request for all the property to be C-2, which the Planning & Zoning Commission approved. Commissioner Bird inquired about the uses the applicant has in mind as he believed some concern has been expressed about the development along U.S.1 Dale Sorensen came before the Board representing the owners and stated that his company will be joint venturing with Proctor/Hodges. He explained their reason for going to C-2 for the entire parcel is because of setbacks. Actually, what they are planning for the front part along U.S.1 will be almost exactly the same as what is there now in the Proctor Plaza and will be in keeping with what is already in the area. To the rear off U.S.I, they will do the warehouse type thing. Discussion ensued re setbacks and permitted uses in C-2 which might be considered more industrial than the uses in C-lA. Planning Manager Keating stated that used car lots are allowed in both C-1 and C-2, but usually there are the heavier type of uses, i.e., warehouses and mini warehouses. Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that there are a lot of differences between C-2 and M-1. Commissioner Bird asked if under C-2 someone, such as a carpenter or electrician, for instance can renovate a warehouse and use it for their place of business, and Planning Director Keating noted that in order to do that, +4%