Laserfiche WebLink
paving program, and that we would have to have a public <br />hearing to set the assessment. <br />Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that the entire cost of <br />the program will be assessed back to the residents, and <br />there will be a public hearing. The question is whether or <br />not to wait 9 or 10 months or more to have the County forces <br />do this as a regular job, which would end up costing more as <br />opposed to having a contractor who is on the site come <br />around the corner and do it right away. The residents would <br />like to have this done as soon as possible. They are not <br />asking that the public hearing re assessment be waived. <br />Discussion continued re the Attorney's suggestion and <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that actually with the amount of <br />projects Public Works has on-going, it might be good to <br />consider in the Petition Paving Program that we have an <br />option available such as this where we do have standard <br />agreements with certain suppliers. <br />Administrator Wright confirmed that staff has been <br />discussing this because our petition paving program is <br />stacked up for about nine months right now. <br />Commissioner Bowman raised a question re the alignment <br />of the road and Attorney Brandenburg assured her that the <br />County Engineering survey staff aligned it. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously <br />(4-0) authorized Attorney Brandenburg to follow <br />the procedure as outlined above. <br />DISCUSS MODIFICATION OF ORDINANCE RE CONSUMPTION OF <br />ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES <br />Blair Smith came before the Board to discuss the <br />problem raised in his letter, as follows: <br />39 <br />JUL 18 1984 Boor. 57 PnI F. 752 <br />