8/22/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

of previous parcels that have received node inclusion. He believed a parcel was given node inclusion on the east side to allow Caprino's new restaurant, and on the west side the node goes out to the other side of 98th Ave. There is over a mile between these two areas, and this leads him to visualize strip zoning. Attorney Henderson also felt confusion arises from mixing the commercial and the industrial - where does one stop and the other begin? He -noted that when Realcor came before the Board in 1982, staff wrote a comprehensive analysis which showed small area plans for this intersec- tion, and many statements were made indicating that the southwest quadrant was intended for industrial purposes. - Attorney Henderson believed the Commission could reasonably interpret the Plan to make these 80 acres available for the proposed project, and if expansion is required for in -fill, which is a concept not even mentioned in the Master Plan, they then could increase the acreage for purposes of in -fill. If the Commission does not feel that is reasonable, then he would suggest that they exercise their right under the discretionary provisions of the Master Plan which allows them to permit a nodal use even though technically the property is not within a node. If none of these options are considered reasonable, he believed this - matter should be tabled until the nodal limits are estab- lished and lines drawn, and he hoped when that is done, the node would not be restricted to its current acreage. Commissioner Bird asked if the first proposal to go ahead and include the subject property and then have the County initiate the change to increase the acreage to provide for the in -fill was feasible, and the Attorney and Planning Director confirmed this can be done. Commissioner Wodtke asked where you would take the 58 acres from, and Planning Director Keating felt that was a 29 AUG 2 2 1984 BOrJ