8/22/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Transportation System The subject property has direct access to State Road 60 (classified as an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare Plan). The maximum development of the subject property for retail shopping could attract up to 3,300 Average Annual Daily Trips. Environment The subject property is not designated as environmentally sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area. Utilities The subject property is not currently served by County water nor wastewater facilities. However, the County intends to provide water to the Kings Highway and State Road 60 intersection within the next year. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, including the -Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the subject property be rezoned to C-1, Commercial District. Commissioner Bird inquired how this relates to the car storage situation which is causing problems in this area, and Planning Director Keating stated that is why the county is initiating this rezoning. They did bring Mr. Nixon into the Code Enforcement Board, and determined the only way for him to come into compliance was to establish some kind of parking facility there and have it be a commercial usage and put up some•kind of pole barn and adequate buffering. He will have to submit a site plan once he gets the rezoning. Question arose as to why the County initiated this rezoning request when Mr. Nixon had created the problem, and Mr. Keating noted that it was because we were in the process of administrative rezonings and we would be doing this within a few months in any event. Chairman Scurlock asked if Mr. Nixon had to pay anything either for this process or for going before the Code Enforcement Board, and Mr. Keating stated that he did not. He will be subject to paying a fee for the site plan approval. If staff had not been in the process of the administrative rezonings, they would not have recommended the Board initiate the rezoning. 35 AUG 2 2 1984 BOOK 58 f�a,r 71