My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
8/22/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
acceptance by the county. City Attorney Vitunac felt this <br />was a mistake and noted that the City has gone on record <br />requesting these be made public streets and asking the <br />county to accept them so they can become public streets. He <br />emphasized that the County would not have any maintenance <br />responsibility, liability, etc. Attorney Vitunac noted that <br />there are residents who are opposed to the street becoming <br />public. He, however, is not admitting that this is a <br />private street yet. In any event, if it is, signing the <br />proposed Resolution would make it public. If the County <br />does not sign it, he stated that he still will maintain it <br />is a public street. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked what the need to have a cul de <br />sac there is other than that the Bergamino property wants to <br />be developed. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that if this street is not <br />opened up, there will be two cul de sacs adjoining each <br />other. It is not in the City's thoroughfare plan to have <br />two dead ends so close together and it would create a <br />problem for City garbage trucks, emergency vehicles, etc. <br />Question arose as to whether the County signs off on <br />City subdivisions plats, and Attorney Brandenburg stated <br />that this was required by a Special Act which we repealed <br />sometime ago. The language on the plat in question was used <br />on all plats up until about two years ago. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that in the event the County <br />doesn't accept the streets, he would assume the developer, <br />Mr. Maguire would still own the rights-of-way . He asked if <br />the City has contacted him to see if they could convey that <br />back to the property owners to have a vehicle for main- <br />taining it to see that it doesn't degredate. <br />Mr. Maguire confirmed that he did develop this and <br />still does own it. <br />45 <br />AUG 2 2 1984 BOOK 58 FACE 81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.