My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
8/22/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
very viable alternative; he also agreed we need to have a <br />complex in the downtown area, but believed we can separate <br />County Court and Circuit Court. Commissioner Wodtke <br />realized this is frustrating for the judges, but rent is a <br />very expensive alternative. <br />Chairman Scurlock brought up the point that when County <br />Court was moved to the 2001 Building temporarily, it <br />functioned satisfactorily. He, therefore, could not believe <br />the half a million dollar figure Architect Calmes estimated <br />to renovate the church building for court purposes. <br />Mr. Calmes explained in detail the court requirements <br />which cause this expense, citing the acoustical require- <br />ments, the recording equipment. He noted that nave of the <br />church and guild hall both could function as courtrooms of a <br />rather nice size, but there are no jury rooms; the restrooms <br />are inadequate for a public building; there is no hall area; <br />and the office area there now would not function as Judge's <br />chambers. There is space for parking, however, and he did <br />feel a third courtroom could be tacked on with proper <br />planning. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that here again, as with the <br />old hospital, we have a building designed for a very special <br />purpose, which we are considering converting to a different <br />use, and he believed it would be preferable to take the <br />money and construct a proper facility from scratch. If we <br />did renovate for the fourth courtroom as originally <br />proposed, he noted we then will have to rent more space for <br />the Public Defender and States Attorney. <br />Commissioner Bird wished to know if we have an <br />indication from the Circuit Judges that the County Courtroom <br />area will satisfy them, and Commissioner Lyons stated that <br />was his understanding after discussing it with Judge <br />Vocelle. <br />57 <br />AUG 2 2 1994Boa F&IH <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.