Laserfiche WebLink
subject property is designated as LD -1, Low -Density Residential <br />1 (up to 3 units/acre). Rezoning the subject property to R -2D <br />would provide a good buffer between the commercial activities <br />on the west side of 27th Avenue and the single-family zoning <br />east of the subject property.` <br />Transportation System <br />The subject property has direct access to 27th Avenue <br />(classified as an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare <br />Plan). The maximum development of the subject property under <br />the R -2D zoning would generate 651 average annual daily trips <br />(AADT). Under the current zoning, the maximum development of <br />the C-1 property could attract up to 7,130 AADT and the R-1 <br />property could generate up to.400 AADT. <br />Environment <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally <br />sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area. <br />Utilities <br />County water and wastewater facilities are not currently <br />available for the subject property. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based upon the above analysis, including the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the <br />subject property be rezoned from C-1 and R-1 to R -2D, <br />Multiple -Family District. <br />Chief Planner Shearer noted that this rezoning was <br />initiated because of a Comprehensive Plan amendment request <br />made earlier. Mrs. Eddy at that time made a rezoning <br />request which was denied, but the Commission indicated they <br />would consider a request for rezoning to multiple family and <br />staff recommended a larger area be rezoned. The Planning & <br />Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 in favor of the proposed <br />rezoning, and R -2D would be consistent with the LD -2 Land <br />Use designation. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. <br />Attorney Sam Block came before the Board representing <br />Mr. & Mrs. Manny Holmes, who own the piece of property on <br />the northeast corner that is being excluded from the <br />rezoning and property to the south and west of the corner <br />piece which is being included. Attorney Block stated that <br />his clients are not opposed to the concept that has been <br />31 <br />BOOK 58 FA;E 1��7 <br />� SEP. 5 �9�4 <br />