Laserfiche WebLink
r SEP <br />5 1984 BOOK 58 PnUF 154 <br />DISCUSSION RE VERO HIGHLANDS STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT <br />OMB Director Barton reviewed the history of the <br />situation, noting that on October 5, 1983, the Commission <br />instructed staff to move forward towards creating an MSTU <br />for Vero Highlands. Since that date a multitude of things <br />have happened; this got put on hold; and staff did not move <br />ahead to establish the district by the January 1, 1984 <br />deadline in order for it to be able to levy a tax this year. <br />Since that time, the state statute has been changed to a <br />July deadline. There have been discussions with the <br />residents and the developer; General Development did conduct <br />a survey; and there still is the indication that a majority <br />of the people wish to have a street lighting district. OMB <br />Director Barton continued that he has tried to come up with <br />a possible way of raising some seed money to put in a <br />minimal amount of street lighting until the district would <br />have the capability of taxing in the year 1985 because there <br />are some problems in the area with emergency services at <br />night because of the lack of street lights. <br />Commissioner Lyons reported that he had been involved <br />in this situation. At the time, there were strong feelings <br />both pro and con, and he would not vote for any funding <br />until he was convinced that the majority of the people in <br />the district could be served and were in favor. He ques- <br />tioned how it could be stated that all the people are in <br />favor of this as he did not believe the mailing done by <br />General Development went to all the people, but only to <br />those in the new Property Owners Association. <br />OMB Director Barton noted that it could be required <br />that another survey be mailed out under our auspices; <br />however, more than half of the lots are still owned by <br />General Development, and it should be determined whether <br />they are entitled to a vote for each lot since every lot <br />would receive an assessment. <br />48 <br />