9/5/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SEP 5 1984 Boor 58 L -,-F ISO train whistles. Mr. Collison also felt this should be a countywide ordinance and urged that the Board adopt it. John Graham, 59 Woodland Drive, agreed with Messrs. Collison and Majewski. He stated that he felt it is a moral issue as well as a safety issue. There are thousands who suffer from these train whistles and have to go to work after losing hours of sleep. Nancy Offutt informed the Board that she had lived for some time in Winter Beach near Cemetery Road, and their home was close to the railroad. She felt that train whistles are for safety purposes and not meant to be melodious; although she personally found them nostalgic. Mrs. Offutt noted that while she lived in this location, she knew of at least four occasions when the crossing bars were out of operation. She further pointed out the hours during which it is proposed that the whistles be banned are those that provide the least visibility. Mrs. Offutt did not feel that train accidents are the way to get drunk drivers off the road, and she also did not feel that airplane noises can be compared to train whistles. Chairman Scurlock asked if there is any way the engineer knows if the crossing bars fail to operate. Mr. Graham said that he had an article wherein the train engineer stated he could always see the crossing and determine whether it was operative, unless, of course, it was on a curve. In rebuttal, he hoped the Board would not fail to pass an ordinance simply because of "nostalgia." Mr. Graham felt strongly that anyone who comes to a crossing and sees the lights, the gates, hears the bells, etc., and crosses is just foolhardy and can never be protected. Dan Richards, resident of Vero Shores, stated that he was representing the people of Vero Shores. He informed the Board that he presented a petition in support of banning the whistles at a preliminary hearing and now has a further 74