9/10/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SEP 10 1984 BOOK 58 �u-UE?08 forth, it will not only be confusing, but very costly and a great mistake. 'Judge Smith suggested that one solution would be to move the Sheriff's Department to the jail site or another site so that States Attorney and Public Defender could have more office space. He believed there is enough space now for another county judge and enough office space for another circuit judge; the courtroom space is the problem. Parking is also a problem, but Judge Smith believed it can be easily solved by using the church parking lots which are not used during the daytime. The great advantage of having everything together is that you can be flexible and can exchange courtrooms. If the Sheriff's Department can be moved, he felt that space should suffice for three or four years. Judge Smith emphasized that if we have to move anything, it should be moved to a site large enough for a complete new courthouse complex in the foreseeable future, particularly as there is the possibility that the county and circuit judges will merge in the future and right now we are going to have two county judges who will be doing some circuit court work. Commissioner Bird asked if Judge Smith felt that the fourth courtroom as designed would suffice as a'large courtroom, and Judge Smith felt it would be very adequate, especially as the design entails not only a large courtroom, but a deposition room, another judge's office and a conference room. Discussion ensued as to the size of the proposed courtroom as compared to the existing courtroom, the cost, the financing involved, and the possibility of this all being relocated in the future. Judge Smith explained that the width is the important factor in a courtroom. Courtroom "C" is 26' wide; Courtrooms "A" and "B" about 18' or 19' wide; and the proposed courtroom, which is an octagonal shape, is 32' 4 o � r