My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/12/1984 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
9/12/1984 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/12/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 58 <br />learned we were going to receive only $4,282; therefore, we must <br />recognize the $1,718 reduction in the amount of revenue. Those <br />were the grants we usually move straight through to the Council <br />on Aging and the Sheltered Workshop. We need to show the <br />expenditure side of the $4,282, which is in the Welfare section, <br />and we will have to reduce the reserve for contingency accord- <br />ingly. This will change the budget figure from $12,900,371 to <br />$12,898,653, but the percentage over rollback will remain 20.260. <br />Commissioner Lyons noted that the Housing Authority is going <br />to come back and ask to have their employee back on the Section <br />8, and he asked if this will create a budget change. <br />OMB Director Barton explained how these funds are laid out - <br />Section 8 is still a budget and it has three people in it; the <br />Housing Authority is a budget with three people in it. If we <br />operate Section 8, it still will be under a separate budget, but <br />we can still utilize the same three people. If it goes back, it <br />means nothing to those budgets, but it does mean something to the <br />administrative operation on the third floor. We would need to <br />add another person and all the fringe benefits, which would be <br />another increase in expenditure and would increase a line item by <br />$15,000 and decrease Reserve for Contingency by an additional <br />$15,000. One way or another, we will end up reducing contin- <br />gency, and OMB Director Barton wished to know if the Board wished <br />to do it now. They did not as this change has not been adopted <br />as yet. <br />Chairman Scurlock commented that since we have had such a <br />tremendous response to the Road Petition Paving Program, he had <br />felt possibly we should allow for additional crew to move this <br />along faster. Administrator Wright, however, has assured him <br />that this can be accomplished without changing the budget. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the 3.6 million for Law <br />Enforcement represents the Sheriff's total budget, and OMB <br />Director Barton confirmed that it did, other than what is in <br />Federal Revenue Sharing. <br />4 <br />® � s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.