Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 2 A 1994 BOOK 8 PACE 452 <br />Mr. Chason explained that it was staff's recommendation <br />and their intent to move the commercial to the corner, and <br />he did not want to get caught in a technicality where the <br />Commission breaks this up and accepts his request for <br />rezoning of the present commercial to residential and denies <br />his request for rezoning residential to commercial with the <br />result that he doesn't have any commercial when he comes out <br />of this meeting. Therefore, he wants to withdraw his, <br />request for rezoning as he does not want to come out with no <br />commercial. <br />Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that Mr. Chason can <br />withdraw. He believed he understood his argument. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that it was not his intent to <br />get Mr. Chason caught in a trap. <br />Discussion ensued as to what happens if he officially <br />asked to withdraw this part of it, and Attorney Brandenburg <br />stated that the only question left is whether Parcel 2 will <br />be rezoned to R -2D. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested a Motion that the portion <br />of Parcel 2 presently zoned R-2 would be rezoned R -2D, and <br />that portion.which is presently zoned commercial would not <br />be included. This would leave it commercial and we would <br />have to look at it another time, and if the County wanted to <br />initiate a rezoning later, we could do that. That would be <br />one motion - the other motion would be to take a broad sweep <br />that all property in the Parcel 2 would be R -2D, but he <br />didn't feel that would be right because the property owner <br />has come in offering a trade to move, his commercial to <br />another location and would end up losing it completely. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that it is his intent that <br />the triangle of C-1 become R -2D, and he wished to know how <br />we keep something from happening on that between now and the <br />time we can get it set up for rezoning to R -2D. <br />W3 <br />