Laserfiche WebLink
� � s <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the Board could rezone <br />it today. <br />Chairman Scurlock brought up the fact that the appli- <br />cant could come in with a site plan and vested interest in <br />the C-1. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the residents still would <br />have the same objections to commercial farther from the <br />intersection. <br />Attorney O'Haire emphasized the residents feel that the <br />character of this community is residential and they would <br />prefer not to have any commercial on the west side of AlA <br />whatsoever. If it has got to be there, they don't want it <br />at the intersection. <br />Commissioner Lyons believed that we really don't hurt <br />the applicant if we rezone to R -2D today as he still has the <br />option to come back. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stated his problem is that we do <br />have a Comprehensive Plan which shows a node, and he felt we <br />would be in a much better position if we say we need to <br />address that 25 acre node through the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted his concern is the ability to <br />get vested, which he pointed out is a problem throughout the <br />county. <br />Mr. Chason,reiterated that this property had and still <br />has a zoning for commercial and for multiple family, and <br />additionally the Comprehensive Plan says there is additional <br />acreage in the node at the intersection. All Vero Beach <br />Trading Corp. has done is cooperate with the County to try <br />to make this compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, and <br />they are not asking for anything other than what the Plan <br />already calls for. That is why he wished to withdraw his <br />rezoning request. <br />Chairman Scurlock inquired if Mr. Chason owns the <br />property, and Mr. Chason stated that he is under contract <br />39 <br />SEP 26 19841400�59 453 <br />