Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 2 6 1994 <br />BOOK <br />for the property and it is subject to commercial and <br />residential just as it is zoned now. <br />5CeIPF <br />The Chairman asked if Mr. Chason still would have a <br />valid contract is he should lose the commercial, and Mr. <br />Chason stated that he would. He continued to emphasize that <br />he came here in good faith about moving the commercial to <br />the corner. If the Commission is going to change the rules, <br />he felt he should have another chance now that they are <br />trying to separate this into two motions and take his <br />commercial away. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if Mr. Chason was agreeable to <br />rezoning the parcel to R -2D and leaving the triangle <br />commercial, and Mr. Chason stated that he did not have any <br />problem with that; however, he wished to point out that he <br />is not an attorney. <br />Attorney O'Haire noted that obviously Mr. Chason has <br />saved himself a lot of legal fees; however, this overall <br />property has a history of creating exactly the problem the <br />Chairman pointed out - that of getting vested rights before <br />the County can move. He believed Mr. Chason should be aware <br />that you cannot make a contractual arrangement on zoning, <br />and pointed out that Mr. Chason has every opportunity to <br />come back to the Board and ask that they take another look <br />at this. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that he would make the <br />following Motion in order to protect the county. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, to adopt <br />Ordinance 84-66 rezoning all of Parcel 2 <br />to R -2D. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stated that he would have to oppose <br />the Motion. <br />He did not think it is fair or a proper action <br />-I <br />