Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 26 1954 BooK F';E�� <br />not require a Plan amendment to downgrade something that <br />potentially could be commercial under the Plan. If it <br />already has a commercial zoning, it does not mean that it <br />has to stay commercial. All it means is that it is okay <br />under the Plan if all the other zoning standards are right <br />for it to be commercial. <br />Mrs. Offutt then asked where is the reliance of the <br />people on the Comprehensive Plan? The people have the <br />responsibility of abiding by it, but where is the reliance <br />on it? <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that the Comprehensive <br />Plan doesn't say there will be twenty-five acres.- all it <br />says is that there is a potential for commercial/tourist- <br />commercial at this location of not more than 25 acres. <br />Commissioner Wodtke emphasized that the Commission sat <br />and worked on the Comprehensive Plan for a long time before <br />designating a 25 acre node. We have not reduced the size of <br />one commercial area; we have done nothing but expand. He is <br />not saying that we may not need to, but that is what we have <br />got now, and he felt strongly that there must be some kind <br />of a reliance on the Plan. <br />Chairman Scurlock did understand Commissioner Wodtke's <br />concern, but noted that we have identified it is correct to <br />do something, and if we don't take action today, then it can <br />go ahead and happen even if it is wrong. He felt the bottom <br />line is here, and we have never said we are infallible. <br />C <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried 3 to 2 with <br />Commissioners Bird and Wodtke voting in <br />opposition. <br />42 <br />