10/24/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attorney McDonough requested the Board to consider redefining the boundary by holding the line of the rezoning at the northern boundary of these three lots. He noted that Mr. Boan has no objection to allowing Mr. Malatino to retain his present C-1 zoning. The gray line depicts the current C-1 zoning boundary, which separates a block of lots. Consequently, they feel that what they are proposing today is neither unprecedented nor unreasonable. If the Commission allows this property to remain C-1, it would be consistent with the surrounding property as Rampmaster is right across the street from Mr. Malatino's property. He then presented photographs of the commercial uses in the area, and further noted that Mr. Malatino did not have the opportunity to present his interests at the Planning & Zoning meeting in September as he did not receive notice of that meeting. Mr. Shearer explained that since Mr. Malatino purchased this property just recently, he did not receive a notice of the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting of September 13, 1984 because it takes approximately 3-4 weeks to have the names changed on the tax rolls. Attorney Paull confirmed that Florida statute requires that a notice be sent to the owner at the last known address, and, therefore, the previous owner of Mr. Malatino's property must have received the notice of the P&Z meeting. Commissioner Bird felt that when commercial property abuts residential, there should be a some sort of buffer, separate the zoning districts, such as a road, a canal, etc., Attorney McDonough believed that if the property is allowed to remain C-1 this problem could be solved at a later date with some sort of a man-made buffer. Commissioner Lyons was concerned about the proposed boundary line cutting through the middle of the block between 20th Lane and 21st Street. 13 OCT 24 1984 BoOx 58 PAGE 715