11/21/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� s � not include the Corrigan property or the Ansin property to the west and south, but we are working them them. Commissioner Wodtke noted there is a piece left out along CR 512, and he asked if their drainage is not tied in. Mr. Davis explained that is unimproved pasture land. It is staff's feeling that if it ever is platted and improved, it then should be made part of the MSTU. Commissioner Wodtke asked if Mr. Ansin did not wish to be involved, and Mr. Davis stated that he got the impression from speaking with him on some occasions that he did not wish to be included. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. Carl Johnson, Vice President of the Property Owners Association of Vero Lakes Estates, informed the Board that he was speaking for the Association and had a series of questions. 1) How can drainage be accomplished at the exit of the 510 canal into the Sebastian River estuary when he believed there is a blockage on the Davis property? Public Works Director Davis believed the real problem in the canal is upstream of the Davis property and felt a survey will have to be done of the whole system. Mr. Johnson felt there would have to be more clearance provided to permit a freer flow to the estuary, and Director Davis concurred, but did not know if we can do this without DER approval. He reported that he has talked with Mr. Corrigan and some of the others who have riparian rights to that drainage system and use that outfall, and they are willing to come up with a yearly maintenance schedule. They have contributed to cleaning out the canal in the past. 2) Can the original topographical study performed by Mr. Beindorf be used? Director Davis felt this study, which was performed in the 501s, might be of some benefit but on a very small scale. He 43 NOV 211984 aoox Ffa:G�