My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11/21/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 1:16:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Weed noted that apparently it is necessary to submit a <br />plan by March 15th, but the results of the study won't be ready <br />for six to eight months; so, how do we meet the deadline? <br />Planning Director Keating explained that by March 15th, we <br />have to have a mechanism in place that will not allow development <br />on the south barrier island in excess of one unit per acre and in <br />the north island allot excess traffic capacity between the county <br />and Town of Orchid and not exceed the capacity of the bridge. <br />Mr. Weed believed they are assuming maximum Comprehensive <br />Plan densities even though those densities may not come about for <br />years. <br />Mr. Keating confirmed that the Comprehensive Plan recognized <br />that development will not come all at once; however, things are <br />proceeding faster than expected. The Hutchinson Island Plan says <br />if you are going to show those densities, you must have a plan <br />for the improvements to be made, particularly since the federal <br />government will not provide any money for the improvements. <br />Mr. Weed asked about a figure for absorption of units in the <br />county over the next years, and Mr. Keating did not know, but <br />stated this will be addressed by the consultant in five year <br />increments; we need this information for the basis of traffic <br />impact fees. <br />Dorothy Hudson, attorney for The Moorings, expressed concern <br />about what the Commission is going to do in the interim period <br />and wished to know if The Moorings can pull a permit. She noted <br />that she has a lot of specific questions to ask. <br />The Chairman did not feel the Board will take any specific <br />action today, but believed there are three options for us to go <br />as presented by Director Keating. <br />Ms. Hudson noted that moratorium seems to be the most <br />discussed option and this can be a lot of different animals. <br />Planning Manager Keating stated that staff's recommendation <br />would be a moratorium on approval of developments which exceed <br />one unit per acre; they would not recommend that there be a <br />69 <br />BOOK 9 <br />NOV 21 1984 �¢� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.