My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11/21/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 1:16:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nov 211984 <br />now, and not in 1985 or 1986, and there should be some way for <br />the county to commit that those facilities will be built in the <br />future and there will be a financial mechanism. If site plans <br />are approved for the remaining capacity of the bridge, they will <br />not be built out for five to six years so the capacity will be <br />there during that time. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that is easy to say but commented <br />that there are some developers who already have 500-600 units <br />vested while you have individuals with hundreds of agricultural <br />acres who don't have the first unit available if this all goes <br />through. Some developers already have a big piece of the pie. <br />Attorney Brandenburg felt we should pursue Mr. Caldwell's <br />suggestion and try to get a commitment from the Governor and <br />Cabinet that this will suffice under the Management plan. If it <br />does, he did not see any difficulty in proceeding with the <br />applications. The difficulty, however, is that the Management <br />Plan says you have to do something else and the fear is if you <br />don't do the something else, it will give them the opportunity to <br />say we are not voluntarily complying. We need an assurance that <br />won't occur, and with that assurance he would feel it would be <br />reasonable to proceed on the basis outlined by Mr. Caldwell. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested presenting the argument that our <br />Comprehensive Plan is a model in the State of Florida, and <br />represents probably the lowest density to be found on the barrier <br />islands anywhere in the state. <br />Attorney Brandenburg agreed we could present that argument, <br />and the DCA would agree we are a model, but would say unless you <br />can build roads to handle those densities, you don't comply. If <br />we can present a plan to get money to build the transportation <br />improvements, and say we have met the requirement to comply with <br />roads meeting density, he believed that would be reasonable and <br />they should let us out, but whether they will do that and look at <br />Martin and St. Lucie Counties differently is dubious. We need <br />assurances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.