Laserfiche WebLink
come in, staff would show her just where her property was in <br />relation to the subject property. <br />T. C. Turner, resident of Tropic Villas, objected to the <br />rezoning, and reported that he has talked with quite a few <br />residents in Tropic Villas who also object to the rezoning as <br />they understood that this property was to remain single family. <br />He also wished to have the meeting postponed until more studies <br />are done. Mr. Turner thought this area along the west side of <br />the river was very beautiful and believed City and County officials <br />have been downgrading more than upgrading recently. He related a <br />recent incident where he had given someone instructions on how to <br />find his home and that individual had said they knew where it <br />was, down near the migrant housing. <br />David Rever of Carter Associates, Inc. disagreed a bit on <br />the density numbers. Using 247 units, it is 4.38 units per acre <br />if you take it over the gross acreage; if you include the right- <br />of-way donation, it is 12.1 units per acre. If you exclude the <br />road right-of-way and build on the remaining acreage, it is 13.6 <br />units per acre. He reported that prior to their survey of the <br />environmental sensitive area, they had retained Dr. Goforth, a <br />biologist who has worked for the State for over 10 years, and had <br />visited the site, along with Art Challacombe from the County's <br />Environmental Planning Department, to establish the boundary <br />line. Their intention is to make use of Indian River Boulevard <br />in conjunction with the development of the area; they would not <br />use Rockridge as a throughway. As far as the drainage problem is <br />concerned, their intention is to work with the system that will <br />be available in that area. He did not anticipate any permanent <br />residential structures on the narrow strip between the development <br />and the environmentally sensitive area except possibly recreational <br />structures. They have not yet developed the site plan and it may <br />well be physically impossible to put 10 units per acre there, but <br />in no event would there be in excess of 247 units. Excluding the <br />roadway, there are only 18.2 buildable acres; including the road <br />27 <br />N OV 28 1984 _ �r�� r In ?7 <br />