09/22/2015 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

{ i no additional right-of-way is needed for the future expansion of the CR 510.The segment of U.S.#1 adjacent to the subject property is a 4 lane paved road with 120 feet of road right of way. For that segment of U.S. #1, there is a need for 40 feet of additional right of way. To the south, the subject property abuts 82nd Street, an unpaved local road. A portion of the property's west boundary abuts 4601 Avenue which is also an unpaved local road. ANALYSIS In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the application will be presented. This section will include the following: • An analysis of the proposed rezoning's impact on public facilities; • An analysis of the proposed rezoning's compatibility with surrounding areas; • An analysis of the proposed rezoning's consistency with the comprehensive plan; and • An analysis of the proposed rezoning's potential impact on environmental quality. Concurrency of Public Facilities The site comprising this request is located within the County's Urban Service Area,an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation,Potable Water,Wastewater,Solid Waste,Stormwater Management,Public Schools, and Recreation(Future Land Use Policy 3.1). Adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained,the comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed for a concurrency determination. For rezoning requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional concurrency determination application process. As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning requests are not projects,county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested land use designation. As per section 910.07(2)of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's LDRs,projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements.In this case, the requested rezoning will change the subject property's zoning from one commercial retail/office zoning district to another similar type of commercial zoning district. Therefore,the most intense use for the subject property will not change due to the requested rezoning.Consequently,the proposed rezoning will not increase the density or intensity of the uses allowed on the subject site and will not have any additional public facility impacts. Thus,this rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested rezoning will not increase the density or intensity of uses on the subject site. As with all projects, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand. An initial- 3 concurrency certificate for 500 multi-family units has been issued for the overall development site, of which the subject property is a part. That concurrency certificate expires on August 8, 2017. 6 149 i