Laserfiche WebLink
yDISCUSSION RE PETITION PAVING OF 10th COURT, SW <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/10/84: <br />TO: DATE: FILE: <br />The Board of County December 10, 1984 <br />Commissioners <br />FRO J sP• <br />. Wi lson <br />tant County Attorney <br />SUBJECT: 10th Court SW Petition <br />Paving <br />REFERENCES: <br />Recently, Jim Davis and I met with the residents of 10th Court SW on the <br />above -referenced matter. Prior to that meeting, Dave Jones and the <br />County surveying crew had staked out the boundary of the proposed road <br />right of way in order for the residents to visualize exactly how the <br />right of way acquisition and paving would affect each individual parcel. <br />The residents who attended the meeting expressed no opposition to the <br />proposed placement of the road and right of way. <br />Most residents wanted to know the total cost of the road and what the <br />assessment to each property owner would be. At that time, we had no <br />estimates of the total construction costs or how much the Commission <br />would assess against the individual property owners. <br />I have attached Jim Davis' estimate of the paving costs. Jim Davis will <br />appear before you on December 19th and advise how he arrived at that <br />estimate. The Board must determine what the total paving costs should <br />be and what percentage of that cost should be assessed against the <br />property owners. <br />If the residents decide, after being advised of the costs, to continue <br />with the project, it will take less than two weeks to prepare and <br />execute most of the deeds to acquire the right of way. If you have any <br />questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to <br />contact me. <br />42 <br />DEC 19 1994 BOOK 59 PAGE 264 <br />J <br />