12/19/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M - r will result from the transportation study. He felt the transportation element is really the key and hoped that the developers would not be encouraged to run in and vest a site plan that they have no intention of developing in the near future. However, if they do attempt to vest a site plan, he suggested that we develop a tool where we can keep a cautious eye to see that they are moving forward into construction and completion. Commissioner Wodtke asked if a developer comes in tomorrow and requests some of the 600 remaining units, can we approve it with the understanding that they are going to participate in any impact fee that would be imposed as a result of the transportation analysis so that, in essence, they would not be using up something that was free. Attorney Brandenburg stated that whenever a barrier island development is approved, the Board has to be mindful of the traffic situation that currently exists and the limited amount of capacity that currently exists on the bridges. If a development comes in between now and the time the transportation study is completed, it should be reviewed under those terms. If the Board feels that they are taking up too large a chunk of the remaining capacity, they also can require the developer to implement certain mitigating factors such as construction of turn lanes and other improvements. In addition, the impact fee that the County will adopt ultimately will probably key in the building permit or certificate of occupancy stage. He felt it is unlikely that many units would be built even if a lot of projects are approved in this interim period, and emphasized that the impact fee, in any event, would be imposed on all the - unbuilt units. Commissioner Bird asked how we could collect revenue from projects that are approved before an impact fee is in existence, and Attorney Brandenburg advised that the revenue would come from a building permit or a certificate of occupancy and that DEC 19 I BOOK 59 PGE,��6