Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Scurlock felt we will have to expand the node <br />for this request to be considered and believed it would be <br />reasonable to square it off with the boundary of the commercial <br />to the north of SR 60; it seems there is existing residential <br />west of that. <br />Commissioner Bird could understand why the Poteats did not <br />want a delay, but he did feel this should wait until the acreage <br />is in the node. He concurred it would be logical to include this <br />property, which would square it off. <br />Commissioner Scurlock suggested that we postpone the public <br />hearing on this and consider it at the same time we amend the <br />Plan and enlarge the node. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that it seems all five Commis- <br />sioners are in favor of the requested rezoning; so, why can't we <br />go ahead and approve it? He felt we had done this before. <br />The County Attorney pointed out those rezonings were based <br />on a provision of the Comprehensive Plan which involves a finding <br />by the Board that the property is not suitable for inclusion in <br />the node; that is not applicable in this case. <br />Chairman Lyons concurred that the Commission is pretty much <br />in agreement this property should be in the node, but we have to <br />follow the steps to get there. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously post- <br />poned this hearing on the Poteat property so that <br />expansion of the node and the rezoning appeal can <br />be considered at the same time, and directed staff <br />to expedite initiating the necessary process. <br />37 <br />mm i <br />BOOK. 9 F' c _�", 9 <br />