1/2/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Wodtke expressed concern about the plant and what will happen to the utilities situation. Commissioner Scurlock did not anticipate anything negative happening with the plant as he was sure there is more demand for utilities in that area that there is an ability to supply it. Commissioner Wodtke continued to discuss the fact that the county did not want to allow a proliferation of utility plants and, therefore, asked these people to work together on forming this water company and building a plant. He noted that this all takes time. Other than that, he agreed that he could not see that any other work has been done. Commissioner Scurlock believed the question is do you vest a site plan forever. This has been going on for quite a few years. Commissioner Bird asked if the County Attorney is saying that the site plan for the water plant should be treated separately, and Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that you must start construction'on your own site plan -with something other than just filling or grading. Mr. Chancellor has not indicated they have done anything other than filling or grading so it does not seem that construction of the project had commenced. Commissioner Scurlock felt the North Beach Water Company is a separate company and they are in the process of building a utility whether or not any of these projects commence or fail. Commissioner Bird agreed that North Beach Water Company has gone on as an independent entity, but it began because of the cooperation of these people whom we asked to cooperate and move ahead this way. He stated that he probably would vote in favor of the Motion, however, based on Attorney Brandenburg's explanation that construction on the site is what should be considered. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried 4 to 1 with Commissioner Wodtke voting in opposition. 53 BOOK 9 F''H'1343 I