1/2/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOL(Fp:GE5O' Mr. Cairns stated that the plant actually is on the adjacent land - it has been built and is operating. Attorney Henderson did not feel there was any question here as to whether construction was commenced in the time limits as might have been true in the Riverbend site plan, and thus the issue being considered is strictly one of abandonment. He submitted that the construction of the sewer plant on the adjacent land is an indication of good faith. Commissioner Scurlock agreed that is the key issue; it is obvious they started construction, but the question is whether it will be continued. Attorney O'Haire commented that he has looked at plans that Mr. Cairns has submitted in the county for fifteen years, but he has never seen anything completed. He believed the schedule reviewed by Mrs. Goetzfried proves that permits were only pulled just before expiration. There has been a rush to construct now just as there was a rush to get the site plan. This is a speculative venture, and not only has there been no evidence of good faith, Mr. O'Haire believed there has been affirmative evidence of bad faith. Commissioner Scurlock agreed that it is obvious that there has not been an effort to move ahead with construction until just recently. Director Keating reported that the plant was not shown on the site or as part of the site plan of the Surf & Racquet Club. It is a separate utility company, and they have a separate franchise for that system. It serves Bay Tree and this project. Commissioner Wodtke did not see how the subject site plan could have been approved without availability of sewers. Question arose as to whether site plans would have been approved that way in 1981, and it was confirmed that it was approved in 1981 without the availability of sewer. Director Keating stated that he was not here at that time, but we now not only require that a plan be submitted for a plant, 60 � � r