Laserfiche WebLink
Fr ­ <br />JAN 2 1985 1 Boy. 59, f,ALF 8 <br />.J ROUTE 60 WATERLINE PROJECT - ENGINEERING CONTRACT, CHANGE ORDER <br />ul t_1 <br />The Board reviewed the following staff memo: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: December 19, 1984 FILE: <br />The Board of County Commissioners <br />THUR: Terrance G. PintoSUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER 1 IN THE AMOUNT OF <br />Utility Service D',,e r $7,150 FOR ENGINEERING CONTRACT <br />ON THE ROUTE 60 WATERLINE <br />PROJECT <br />FROM: Jose A. Baird REFERENCES: <br />Assistant Utility Director <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />In order to facilitate the Route 60 waterline and stabilize water <br />pressure throughout the South County Water System, there will be <br />the need for additional altitude valves and chambers to be added to <br />the following water tanks. <br />1. The 5.00,000 gallon -elevated water storage <br />tank at the water plant. <br />2. The 150,000 gallon elevated water tank near Velde <br />Ford. <br />These modifications will require additional engineering design and <br />resident inspection work to be performed by Sippel, Masteller, <br />Lorenz $ Hoover, Inc., the Consulting Engineers on the Route 60 <br />Water Project. <br />The additional work will mean an increase in engineering fees of <br />$7,500 on the Route 60 waterline project <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />There are no alternatives. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The Honorable Board of County Commissioners approve Change Order <br />No. 1 from Sippel, Masteller, Lorenz F Hoover, Inc., the Consulting <br />Engineers on the Route 60 Water Project. <br />Commissioner Scurlock had a question re the financing on the <br />water tank itself and whether we will need interim financing. <br />Utilities Director Pinto noted that the interim financing <br />doesn't have anything to do with just the water tank; it relates <br />to the whole project and would be necessary with or without this <br />increase. <br />� � r <br />