My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r JAN 16 1985 � 1 <br />BOOK 5th 472 <br />that it constitutes a legislative decision. Director Keating <br />noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission did vote unanimously <br />to recommend the adoption of the new residential districts. <br />Attorney Brandenburg wished to clarify further that a <br />special exception use involves a situation where it is felt you <br />cannot anticipate in advance each and every condition you might <br />want to impose on that project; therefore, the special exception <br />process is set up to allow the flexibility of taking that into <br />account by adding special conditions to the project and making <br />them part of the approval that project must conform with when it <br />is built. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if there can be a preapplication <br />conference where the applicant can be made aware of just what is <br />required, and Director Keating assured him there would be such a <br />conference. <br />Commissioner Bird had a question pertaining to all <br />districts. He noted that recreational uses are listed under the <br />permitted uses, and this includes parks and playgrounds open to <br />the public. He wondered if boat ramps would be considered parks <br />and playgrounds. <br />Attorney Brandenburg felt a boat ramp would be an accessory <br />use to a park. He believed what is set up would give the Board <br />discretion to decide what the area is like and what type of park <br />should go in that neighborhood. <br />Chairman Lyons announced that the Board would now review the <br />proposed ordinance five pages at a time. <br />Page 2 - no changes. <br />On Page 3 - 3.1B. - Permitted Uses, Paragraph 1 - Attorney <br />Brandenburg felt this should be reworded to read that "It is the <br />intent of this ordinance to permit certain uses not otherwise <br />illegal..." rather than "any uses not otherwise illegal." <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if we have definitions anywhere, <br />and Attorney Brandenburg stated that when this ordinance is <br />adopted, we will be using the same definitions which are in the <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.