My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
under PRD. He noted they did not want to create too many <br />districts but felt the RT -6 would be a good one to have. <br />Pages 22 and 23 - no changes. <br />Page 24 - Director Keating noted that currently we don't <br />have any multi family zoning districts less than 4 units per acre <br />and the RM -3 would provide for multi family at 3 units per acre <br />to be consistent with the LD -1 Comprehensive Plan designation. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked about having single family <br />attached in this district and Director Keating noted that these <br />are multi family districts and single family attached can be <br />built; they would not have to go to PRD. <br />Page 25 and 26 - no changes. <br />Page 27 - Table 10 - Developer Peter Robinson noted that the <br />Minimum Floor Area Section under MF refers to Section 10(K), and <br />he cannot find any Section 10(K). It was felt that was incorrect <br />and from the old ordinance. <br />Director Keating believed these numbers are reflected on the. - <br />next to last page of the new Ordinance, under Attachment #2 - <br />Summary Table, Minimum Floor Area. He stated what we will have <br />to do is put in under RM -3, RM -4 and RM -6 the numbers that are <br />reflected in Minimum Floor Area Other, which is 550 sq. ft. We <br />will eliminate the reference to 10K and insert 550 all across <br />where it says 10K. <br />Mr. Robinson pointed out that there were two references to <br />MF on Table 10, one being Duplex and MF. Director Keating <br />believed what we should do is eliminate the entire MF row that <br />refers to Sec. 10K, and in the row entitled Duplex and MF change <br />the 750 to 550 all across. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that then you can have a duplex <br />with a minimum floor area of 550 sq. ft., and this was confirmed. <br />Pages 28 and 29 - no changes. <br />Page 30 - Director Keating wished to point out that these <br />Required Improvements relate to the Subdivision Ordinance and <br />23 <br />s�. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.