1/16/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JAN 16 1935 aooK 59 !--n 476 profit-making college; Commissioner Bird asked if we want to exclude such private facilities. Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that there are many kinds of vocational schools., including automotive schools where they work on semi -trucks, etc., and you wouldn't want these in residential districts; although some of these uses may be allowed, he felt you want more control over them. Page 13 - Commissioner Wodtke inquired if there were any changes in the table for size and dimension criteria for RFD, and Chief Planner Shearer explained that we do not have the RFD District at the present time, but he felt probably this is similar to R-lE and these would be the same setbacks as in RS -1. Page 14 - 5C., Paragraph 2., - Commissioner Bowman questioned why Recreation Uses should require an Administrative Permit. Director Keating confirmed that recreation uses are allowed in all residential districts, but Attorney Brandenburg explained that requiring of an administrative permit enables us to be sure the use is compatible with the neighborhood. Page 15 - no changes, and it was noted that on Page 16, Table 5, RS -1 is comparable to R-lE, but they have lowered the minimum floor area to 1,200 sq. ft. Pages 17, 18, and 19 - no changes, and it was noted that on Page 20, Table 6, the RS -6 District is similar to the current R-1 size and dimension requirements, and the RS -3 District is between R -1A and R-lAA. Page 21 - Sec. 9. - RT -6 Two -Family Residential District. Planner Shearer explained that this is a residential district that allows duplex development in single family. If you have two distinct structures that share a wall, that is considered single family attached. A duplex is one building that is divided in two, and the common wall would be an interior wall. Commissioner Wodtke asked where single family attached dwellings are allowed, and Director Keating stated that would be 22 M M M