My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/16/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/16/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-I <br />JAN 16 1985 59 F,; -UF 480 <br />Page 45 - Commissioner Wodtke questioned the criteria for <br />Guest Cottages which states that they shall not contain kitchen <br />facilities. <br />Commissioner Bird asked about a separate facility for <br />servant quarters, and Director Keating stated that we don't have <br />such a provision at this time. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed there is the problem of these <br />quarters being converted into rental units. <br />Commissioner Wodtke did not feel a second kitchen is that <br />objectionable as long as it isn't a permanent situation, and <br />Commissioner Bird noted the criteria sets out that the cottage <br />shall be used only for intermittent or temporary occupancy by a <br />non-paying guest. <br />Director Keating agreed the ordinance sets this out plainly, <br />but it is the enforcement they have a problem with. <br />Chairman Lyons felt the issue here is whether there should <br />be a kitchen or not, and Director Keating stated that he <br />personally didn't have a problem with deleting this requirement. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that from a practical aspect, <br />people will build without a kitchen, but later on kitchen <br />equipment will be added. <br />It was agreed to delete the requirement that a guest cottage <br />shall not contain kitchen facilities. <br />Commissioner Wodtke had a general question in regard to golf <br />courses and accessory facilities and that is whether we have a <br />park zoning. <br />Planner Shearer stated that we have a Marine Park Zone, but <br />not a Park zoning district. Hobart Park is part R-1 and part <br />Agricultural. <br />Pages 46 through 55 - no changes. <br />Pages 56 and 57 - Commissioner Wodtke asked if Veterinary <br />Clinics will be permitted in commercial areas, and this was <br />confirmed. He then asked about airports, noting that Aerodrome <br />Subdivision is zoned Agricultural, but they have beautiful <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.