1/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JAN 2 3 1985 BOQK 59 F�t:;u 64 Regardless of whether or not the subject property can be included in the node, rezoning a one acre parcel of land, surrounded by single-family zoning, to a general commercial zoning classification constitutes spot zoning. Transportation System The subject property has direct access to County Road 512 (classified as an arterial street on the Thoroughfare Plan), and to 106th Avenue and 105th Court (classified as local streets). The maximum development of the subject property under C-1 zoning could attract up to 950 average annual daily trips (AADT). Environment The subject property is not designated as environmentally sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area. Utilities The subject property is not served by County water nor wastewater facilities. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, including the facts that the staff does not feel the subject property can logically be included in the node, the fact that rezoning the subject property would constitute spot zoning, and the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that this rezoning request be denied. Planner Richard Shearer presented staff's recommendation for denial of this rezoning request explaining they feel that the subject property cannot logically be included in the node and rezoning the subject property would constitute spot zoning. Chairman Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Michael O'Haire, attorney representing owner John D. Lisle, Sr., distributed colored maps of the area and pointed out that the proposed boundaries of the commercial/industrial node located at I-95 & CR -512 are really what prompted this appeal. He explained that there is no use in place in this vicinity at this time; there is residential and agricultural zoning, but what has been platted as residential on the south side of CR -510 is not really a plat. It is actually a survey which was entered into 20