1/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M M M the public records before the subdivision ordinance was passed, and it is not a legitimate plat as there are no County maintained roads, ditches or drainage system. Attorney O'Haire advised that he also has been approached by a number of other owners of property along the south side CR -512 in this vicinity to request a rezoning. These people feel that this initial request is more or less a trial balloon, and they also feel very strongly that it is not spot zoning. To the contrary, they feel that having R-lE immediately south of a 30 -foot paved road, north of which is a commercial/industrial node, constitutes spot zoning. He noted that the property between the Hetra property and I-95 on the north side of CR -512 is "infill" property, and nowhere is it cast in concrete that the commercial boundary must be on the north side of CR -512. Attorney O'Haire pointed out that the commercial node at SR -60 and Kings Highway, which stretches from Kings Highway to 43rd Avenue, zigzags back and forth across SR -60, and he felt this request would be consistent with what was done in that node. Attorney O'Haire continued that his client is the first to request a commercial use on a piece of property south of CR -512, and he believed that the zoning will be tested as time goes by and people have actual uses for the property in that area. Given the fact that the subject property is across the road from a commercial/industrial node that consists of infill property and that there is a projected industrial use for property east of I-95, he argued that it would be entirely appropriate for the subject property to be developed as commercial, rather than R-lE, which is is the most restricted residential district in the County, and therefore, it would be appropriate for the Board to give consideration to a modification of the Comp Plan as well as a change in zoning. 21 L- JAN 2 3 1985 BOOK 5.9 PvF 642