1/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JAN 2 3 1985 BOOK 59 ?AGE 645 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/15/85: U• The Honorable Members DATE: January 15, 1985 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: APPEAL OF SUMMERPLACE SUBJECT: SITETED PLANAAPPROVALP II Robert M. Keat'ng, 6fCP Planning & Development Director FROM: Mary Jane V. Goetzfried REFERENCES: App. pp. Summerplace 1 Chief, Current Development Section DIS:MARYJ It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of January 23, 1985. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On December 20, 1984 the Planning and Zoning Commission ap- proved a site plan application submitted by Summerplace Limited Partnership II, a business entity of which Thomas H. Collins is a principal. The development proposal provides for the con- struction of. -a two-story banking and professional building on the northwest corner of the intersection of C.R. 510 and S.R. A -1-A, which is more particularly described as Lots L & M Summerplace Subdivision, Unit 1. The applicant has proposed a 3,192 square foot bank and 4,338 square feet of professional office space for the .69 acre site. As proposed, the business center will be accessed via a 24' two-way drive located on S.R. A -1-A. Additionally, a 2 lane drive-through bank teller is to be constructed along the west side of the structure, allowing vehicles to exit on to C.R. 512. The stormwater management plan, the landscape plan, and the utilities plan all meet County regulations and have been approved. The southeast and southwest quadrants of the S.R. A -1-A and C.R. 510 intersection are presently undeveloped. However, an approved site plan exists for the construction of a 300 unit hotel on the east side of A -1-A and a site plan application has been submitted for the development of a 258 unit condominium project on the west side of A -1-A. A retail/ - office building is situated on the northeast corner of the intersection, while the remainder of the general area to the north is occupied by single-family residences. It is approval of this site plan application that the Planning & Development Division is appealing. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS During the course of review, the Technical Review Committee identified a problem with regard to access to the site. The problem relates to the available site frontage and the short distance between the 510/AIA intersection and the north and west property lines of the site. Given the restricted site frontage on SR AIA, the location of Shell Drive at the north property line of the site, and planned improvements to the 510/AIA intersection, the Technical Review Committee determined that access from the site to AIA should not be allowed. 24