My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/23/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1/23/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
trips generated. He urged the Board to endorse the <br />recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. <br />Administrator Wright again pointed out that the intersection <br />is one of the most critical links in the north barrier island <br />traffic pattern. <br />Mr. Collins emphasized that they have addressed the deed <br />restriction element and have received the approval of the <br />subdivision residents, and again stressed that if they cannot use <br />this location for a bank facility, they will come back in for <br />some other type of establishment that may impact the intersection <br />even more so. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed <br />the Public Hearing. <br />Chairman Lyons felt it is unfortunate that the corner is <br />zoned commercial, but since it is, he wondered which is the <br />lesser of two evils -- a more intensive use or access through <br />Shell Lane. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed that if Lot L cannot be used <br />for commercial because of the deed restrictions, another use <br />might result in having the egress and ingress closer to the <br />intersection. He preferred to have the entrance closer to Shell <br />Lane, but since the owner must get the property owners' approval <br />as to how Lot L is going to be used, he felt comfortable in <br />accepting the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that to limit it to just the one <br />lot would be a lot better than what has been suggested and <br />advised that he supports staff's appeal of the P & Z approval of <br />the site plan. <br />Commissioner Bowman advised that she is also in support of <br />staff's position because she believes this would be a traffic <br />33 <br />JAN 2 3 1985 BOOK 59 FA, -r-654 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.