Laserfiche WebLink
r JAN 2 3 1985 <br />BOOK t 9 Fl, UF 65, 9 <br />would impact the site plan, but he certainly is not adverse to <br />discussing these issues with staff. <br />Chairman. Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that this public hearing is <br />to determine if the site plan has progressed sufficiently to <br />continue approval or whether to abandon the site plan. <br />Attorney Stewart realized that the Board has the authority <br />to void the site plan, but felt that they must show that <br />sufficient progress has not been made. He pointed out that the <br />burden is on staff to prove that -- not his client. He felt that <br />the only testimony from staff has been the reference to the one <br />building under construction and that most of the verbiage in <br />staff's memo does not really address the issue, except for the <br />Chronology of Events which is rather sketchy, and in some places, <br />not accurate, because many of the activities have been omitted. <br />He further commented that he has called the Planning Department <br />on several occasions as to what has been taking place on this <br />project, but the Planning Dept. has not seen fit to call him to <br />indicate whether sufficient progress was being made to continue <br />site plan approval. He felt that his client has made a good <br />faith effort to proceed in this project. <br />Attorney Stewart entered into the record the following <br />Chronology of Events relating to the subject property: <br />37 <br />_ M M <br />