Laserfiche WebLink
TO: The Honorable Members of thEDATE: January 18, 1985 FILE: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />THRU: Terrance G. Pinto <br />Utility Services Dir for ESTABLISHMENT OF FRANCHISE <br />SUBJECT: RIVERWALK UTILITIES, INC. <br />FROM: Joyce S. HamiAn <br />Franchise Admin <br />Utility Services <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />REFERENCES: 1) Resolution <br />Riverwalk Utilities, Inc., has applied for a water and waste- <br />water franchise to serve the Riverwalk Shopping Center. This <br />is a commercial development occupying approximately 12.5 acres <br />located on the corner west of U. S. #1 and south of Roseland <br />Road in north Indian River County (location map is Exhibit "A" <br />to resolution). <br />The wastewater treatment facility is designed to treat 20,000 <br />gallons average daily flow. Adjacent to the treatment facility <br />will be a two -cell rapid rate percolation pond for the dis- <br />posal of effluent from the system. The potable water treat- <br />ment facility is designed to treat 20,000 gallons per day. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />Applicant has met all requirements of our application including <br />fire flow requirements required by the Indian River County Fire <br />Department and liability insurance (Exhibit "B" to resolution). <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution (Exhibit 11111) <br />granting Riverwalk Utilities, Inc., a water and wastewater franchise. <br />Franchise Administrator Joyce Hamilton presented staff's <br />recommendation for issuing Riverwalk Utilities, Inc. a water and <br />wastewater franchise to service the Riverwalk Shopping Center in <br />Sebastian. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the rate structure would be <br />set later, and Mrs. Hamilton explained that this would be <br />in-house service only and if a rate structure is set, it would be <br />at a later public hearing. She explained that a franchise is <br />needed here because the buildings are not all under one roof, and <br />further advised that the South County Fire District has reviewed <br />this in re fire flow requirements. <br />59 <br />FEB 6 1985 aooa FAGE 899 <br />