My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
2/13/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/13/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to close that cut and connect them up further along, that could <br />be workable, but unless staff comes in at the site plan level and <br />gets that temporary condition set out, it would be very difficult <br />to get the median cut closed at some future time. <br />Commissioner Wodkte noted that one of the big problems in <br />this area is that U.S.I and the property lines are not parallel <br />and you get very odd shaped pieces of property. He continued to <br />discuss distance between curb cuts, and asked Director Davis if <br />there were a traffic light at Hobert intersection, which would <br />allow for a change in the traffic pattern, if he felt the <br />distance of 600' feet from the light would be a problem. <br />Director Davis did not feel 600' would be such a problem, <br />but he noted that the DOT green book addresses access control and <br />curb cuts, and they have many problems with this access, being <br />that there is no road lighting and at night it is a very dark <br />corridor. He did concur there should be some median cut not too <br />far from Hobart Road; 79th St. is about 1/4 mile north, and he <br />believed that would be the most logical median cut. <br />Dale Sorensen came before the Board representing the owners <br />of the property in question. He wished to have it clarified what <br />"temporary" refers to - the median cut or the access to U.S.I? <br />The Vice Chairman stated basically the access to U.S.I; he <br />noted that from a traffic standpoint, it may be a benefit later <br />on to have an entrance on the property to the north to access the <br />subject property. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that they still would have <br />access on U.S.I at all times, but the question would be where it <br />would be located; and the access they would have on U.S.I would <br />probably be where the median cut was, but it quite probably would <br />be further to the north. He emphasized that the subject project <br />would not be deprived of access to U.S.I at any time. <br />Mr. Sorensen inquired whose expense this would be, and <br />Director Davis stated that it would be the expense of the <br />19 <br />L- FEB 13 1985 <br />BOOK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.