My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
2/13/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/13/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />FEB <br />'1 <br />1985 <br />BOOK 59 F;F <br />862 <br />developers <br />further to the north if that median cut could be <br />located along their frontage. <br />Mr. Sorensen stated that the main issue is that they have a <br />direct access to U.S.I. He pointed out that it is 625' up to <br />79th St. from the north boundary of their property, and he felt <br />they are in the most logical place to put the access; they are <br />willing to move their access further north if that would be <br />better for the people across the street, but he did not feel they <br />can agree to anything in terms of temporary access to U.S.I. Mr. <br />Sorensen also believed they could agree, to the median cut being <br />a temporary thing and felt the DOT actually controls that in any <br />event. <br />Vice Chairman Scurlock commented that Mr. Sorensen <br />apparently is saying he would still have his entranceway and he <br />is willing to move it further north, and then at some point in <br />time if we want to take the median cut away, he agrees we would <br />have the ability to do it. <br />Public Works Director Davis felt our ability there is not <br />clear. Possibly something could be included in the site plan as <br />a condition stating that the median cut could be closed if one <br />were provided to the north and if the marginal access connection <br />could be made, but there still would have to be some changes to <br />the site plan, such as the marginal access easement. <br />Mr. Sorensen raised objections to staff's presentation <br />noting that his group agreed at the Planning & Zoning hearing to <br />do away with any left turns onto U.S.I. He felt, as a practical <br />solution to this problem, they could put a little median actually <br />within their exit to U.S.I which would force the people to turn <br />right, and they are willing to do this. <br />Mr. Sorensen next took issue with staff's remarks about the <br />type and size of the proposed project. He felt that a 65,000 sq. <br />ft. project is a major project, not just some "rinky-dink" <br />warehouses. The buildings that front U.S.I will be approximately <br />24,000 sq. ft. Mr. Sorensen pointed out that part of this <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.