2/20/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Since a minimum of paving information is shown on the site plan, it is difficult to determine which aspects of the general parking standards are adequately addressed. However, it is obvious that driveway and parking aisle widths are not adequate under today's code. Staff re- quested the submittal of a detailed parking plan. 3) A complete site plan application would include a tree survey which provides the location, size and common name of all protected trees, in addition to a tree removal permit application and a landclearing permit application. 4) Although the drainage system has been designed for a 25 year/24 hour storm, a type "A" Stormwater Management permit is' required. Construction drawings showing design finish grade of entire drainage system would be required, prior to the issuance of any additional building permits. 5) If the project was recently submitted, left turn lanes and deceleration lanes along S.R. A -1-A would be required. Additionally, a traffic impact statement and a $3,240 contribution toward signalization and widening of the S.R. A-1-A/C.R. 510 intersection would be required. Complete 3 lane widening of S.R. A -1-A from project's south property line to C.R. 510 intersection is recommended. 6) While the Coastal Construction line has not been offi- cially relocated, staff recommended consideration be given to the effect of beach erosion, on the subject property, that may have occurred over the past 4 years. 7) Mr. Nutt has also been requested to provide information with regard to how the 4 unit structure will function as a hotel once a certificate -of -occupancy is issued. 8) Finally, staff recommended that a construction schedule, outlining proposed dates of phase completion, be submit- ted. While these issues were discussed at length during the meeting of January 29, no specific item was resolved. Staff antici- pates a second meeting will be scheduled for the week of February 11-15, the outcome of which will be presented to the ` Board at their regular business meeting of February 20, 1985. ANATNA T S When the Board of County Commissioners was originally presented with the question of the validity of the Sea Oaks Hotel site plan, the Board indicated that if all applicable aspects of the Code were addressed, consideration may be given to validation 47 rEB 20 1985 Pa.c1-953