My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/20/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
2/20/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:11 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:11:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/20/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />FEB 2 0 1985 59 P°'Gr <br />Pelican Island. We do control this under our site plans, and the <br />Hutchinson Island Resource ,Management Committee felt that the <br />local government, being the principal respondent to site plans, <br />could best monitor this. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if this would affect developers and <br />involve a requirement that is not already in place; Director <br />Keating explained that it just is more stringent than what is in <br />place right now. <br />Public Works Director Davis reported that the DER is <br />developing specific standards and criteria, and after they come <br />out with their performance criteria, -we may want to change our <br />ordinance. Right now they simply state that you cannot degrade <br />the water quality in the receiving waters. <br />Attorney Paul agreed that is the rule, but it is quite vague <br />and doesn't set out criteria to meet it. It only applies to <br />projects where a DER permit is not otherwise required. Our local <br />ordinance would pick up the smaller projects. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if this applies to the county and <br />our road system, and Public Works Director Davis stated that it <br />does. <br />Commissioner Bowman had a question in regard to the wording <br />at the top of page 2 of the ordinance. She felt it would read <br />better and be more consistent with "by showing" if it said "by <br />providing" rather than "and provide." <br />Attorney Paull stated that as he read it, an applicant is <br />required "to demonstrate" and "to provide." He must demonstrate <br />he can comply and he must provide the DER documentation. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt this should be in two sentences. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />There were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.