ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
<br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously
<br />granted a one-year extension of site plan
<br />approval as requested by Edgar Schlitt.
<br />C. Release of Easement - John D. Lisle, Sr. - Pine Lake
<br />Estates Subdivision
<br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/27/85:
<br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: February 27, 1985 FILE:
<br />of the Board of County
<br />Commissioners
<br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: RELEASE OF EASEMENT REQUEST
<br />BY JOHN D. LISLE, SR.
<br />SUBJECT:- SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOTS 8,
<br />9, 10, 11, 28, 29, 30 AND
<br />Robert M. Keating, CP 31, BLOCK D, UNIT #1, PINE
<br />Planning & Development Director LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION
<br />FROM: Betty Davis REFERENCES: R/E Lisle
<br />Code Enforcement Officer DIS:REBDAD
<br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
<br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
<br />regular meeting of March 13, 1985.
<br />DESCRIPTION AND .CONDITIONS:
<br />The County has been petitioned by John D. Lisle, Sr., owner of
<br />the subject property, for release of the rear lot 10 foot
<br />easement of lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 28, 29, 30 and 31, Block D, Unit
<br />#1, Pine Lake Estates, being the westerly 10 feet of Lots 8, 9,
<br />10 and 11, Block D, Pine Lake Estates, Unit #1, and the
<br />easterly 10 feet of Lots 28, 29, 30 and 31, Block D, Unit 1,
<br />Pine Lake Estates. He is also requesting the release of the
<br />side lot 10' easement of Lots 11 and 28, Block D, Pine Lake
<br />Estates Subdivision, Unit #1, being the southerly 10' thereof.
<br />These lots are 70 feet in width and 125 feet in depth. It is
<br />Mr. Lisle's intention to consolidate the lots into one large
<br />building site meeting the criteria of the R-lE zoning district
<br />and construct a single-family residence on the site.
<br />The current zoning classification is R-lE, Country Estate
<br />District. The land use designation is LD -1, Low Density
<br />Residential, up to 3 units per acre.
<br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
<br />The request has been reviewed by Southern Bell, Florida Power &
<br />Light Company, Jones Intercable, and the Utility and
<br />Right-of-way Departments. Based upon their review,.there were
<br />no objections to release of the easements. The zoning staff
<br />analysis, which included a site visit, showed that drainage
<br />would be adequately handled on-site.
<br />5
<br />MAR 13 1985 BOOK 60 FaU,E x:28
<br />
|