Laserfiche WebLink
situation; the squaring off of the commercial area; and the <br />general characteristics of the area. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, the -Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird wished to know at what point we are going <br />to address where Indian Boulevard will connect, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock stated that this is going to be addressed very quickly <br />in the Transportation Planning Committee. Access is contemplated <br />at 4th, 8th and 12th Sts. <br />Chairman Lyons believed.the design is done, and the <br />Administrator confirmed that the Board authorized the engineering <br />for Indian River Blvd. south; the design calls for the terminus <br />at 4th Street; we have the plan here; and people have come in and <br />looked at it. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bowman, to adopt Ordinance 85-26 <br />rezoning the subject property to C-1 and RM -10 as <br />requested by Ed Schlitt. <br />Chairman Lyons believed time makes it such that we have to <br />open up this additional roadway; we will do our very best to <br />accommodate people in Vista Royale and Vista Gardens, but he did <br />not think we can get by without having this road. <br />Commissioner Scurlock°did not believe the Commission ever <br />voted not to do Indian River Boulevard; it was its priority and <br />actual design that was in question. He felt this always has been <br />considered as a parallel to U.S.1 and a by-pass of the city. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that we have a further opportunity <br />to address how this affects Vista Royale people when staff <br />reviews the site plan for WallMart. <br />65 <br />MAR 2 01995 Book 60 <br />