My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/27/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
3/27/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:16:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/27/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r MAR 27 1995�3 <br />BOOK 60 F�,Ij , t e, <br />The Planning Department reviewed the application on the basis <br />of its conformance with County ordinances. Staff determined <br />the modifications would not result in any nonconformance, in <br />that the total acreage devoted to park and recreation area <br />would not be reduced. In addition, the primary facilities of <br />the complex would not be altered. Regardless of the fact that <br />many of the residents may have purchased mobile homes and <br />leased lots within Village Green West as a result of the <br />representations that were made to them regarding available <br />and planned amenities, it is the staff's position that an <br />applicant should be allowed to modify his approved site plan <br />at any time, as long as he maintains consistency with <br />applicable County regulations. Since the proposed <br />modifications are consistent with all County regulations, the <br />staff feels that the proposed modifications should be <br />approved. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Planning staff recommends that the County Commission <br />grant Florida Atlantic's appeal of the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission denial, and thereby approve the application to <br />modify the Village Green West recreational complex site plan. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the question today is whether or <br />not purchasers have a reasonable right to expect certain <br />amenities to be built that have been depicted in a site plan. He <br />expressed some uncertainty, however, whether the County has the <br />legal ability to require those amenities to be built or whether <br />it might be that some sort of civil action would be needed to <br />take care of what was promised. He wondered why we require <br />certain structures and improvements to be depicted on a site <br />plan, if, in fact, we don't have the ability to say that they <br />must be made. <br />Director Keating reported that when residents of Village <br />Green West came in and pointed out that certain amenities shown <br />on the site plan were never built, he determined that, like in <br />all site plans, there are certain accessory type of improvements <br />that may have been a basis for the Planning & Zoning Commission's <br />approval of the site plan which would have to be built as <br />depicted, unless the developer was granted a modification of site <br />plan. This can be done either through an administrative approval <br />or through the Planning & Zoning Commission. If an applicant <br />requests a modification to a site plan which lowers the density <br />of the site plan, such as reducing it by a unit or two, and it <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.