My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
4/10/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2020 10:11:59 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:18:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 10 1995 <br />BOOK CO PnE 472 <br />to his letter to the Board requesting that special consider- <br />ation be given to his clients request that their property be <br />deleted from this rezoning, with the understanding that they <br />could come back at a later date to request a change in the <br />land use designation. Attorney Heath realized that they are <br />grandfathered in, but felt that they could do something with <br />6 units per acre. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously <br />closed the Public Hearing. <br />Director Keating noted that no one was here from <br />Roseland today and felt that gave a wrong impression because <br />Roseland residents had packed the chambers at the three <br />Planning & Zoning Commission meetings clamoring for lower <br />densities, and they had made good points about salt -water <br />intrusion and the lack of public water and wastewater. He <br />noted that they have submitted a petition against higher <br />densities. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt that some commercial estab- <br />lishments should be considered commercial after 30 years of <br />use in commercial and should not be included in residential. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that a compromise at 6 units <br />per acre might be reasonable but cautioned that while no <br />Roseland residents were in attendance today, they were of <br />the belief that 4 units per acre would be approved today. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if we have the right to <br />consider 6 units per acre when the advertisement was for 4 <br />units per acre. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that we have advertised for <br />a downzoning and what we would be doing is just not going <br />down as far. He felt the Board had that authority. <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.