My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/8/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
5/8/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/08/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pointed out that 35' high buildings are allowed in Single Family <br />districts also. <br />Chairman Lyons asked Frank Zorc if he was the developer of <br />the multiple family project on 6th Street, and Mr. Zorc stated he <br />was not, and that the only land they still own are lots 14 <br />through 20 on 9th Court, which is zoned R2 -B, Multiple -Family, <br />but cannot be used because of objections raised in the past. <br />Chairman Lyons was curious why Mrs. Allen referred to that <br />project as being government quarters type of housing because when <br />he drove by there yesterday to take a look at what is being built <br />out there, he did not find it very objectionable. <br />Mr. Zorc explained that he built only the first unit in that <br />subdivision, a Spanish type home. He felt that the proposed <br />rezoning was not fair since the applicants' property abuts other <br />property that is restricted to single family even though it is <br />zoned multiple family at 8 units per acre. Speaking as a part <br />owner and trustee for owners in Colonial Heights, Mr. Zorc, who <br />owns Lots 14-20, urged the Board to consider a more consistent <br />phasing of densities in order to protect everyone, such as <br />allowing 8 units per acre to remain in the central section of. <br />Colonial Heights and permit 4 upa on the land he owns and 4 upa <br />on the applicants' property. As it stands right now, Mr. Zorc <br />emphasized that on Lots 14-20 he is faced with building only 2 <br />units per acre when someone next door could go to 4 units per <br />acre. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt Mr. Zorc had a valid point, and <br />asked Attorney Brandenburg if we have the legal ability to take <br />any action on Mr. Zorc's property today. <br />Attorney Brandenburg advised that another hearing would have <br />to be scheduled for Mr. Zorc's request. He believed, however, <br />that the single family requirement was due to a deed restriction <br />being placed on Mr. Zorc's plat back then. He explained that <br />could be resolved by either vacating the restriction on the plat <br />27 UU <br />BOOK 0 P��GE O?� <br />MAY � 1�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.