My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/8/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
5/8/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/08/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 8 1995 <br />BOOK <br />60 F',GE S? <br />or by the County executing a separate agreement that would <br />accomplish the same thing and recording it in the public records. <br />Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that we are dealing with an <br />odd -shaped piece of property which is long and narrow. <br />Chairman Lyons believed that the neighborhood to the south <br />actually deserves more protection than the neighborhood to the <br />west of Mr. Zorc's property because of how the buildings and <br />yards are maintained. <br />Mr. Zorc stated that he was glad that Chairman Lyons made <br />that point. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Mr. Zorc what densities he could <br />build at, and Mr. Zorc stated that he no longer owned lots 9-13, <br />but the new owners could build at 8 units per acre and it could <br />be multiple family. <br />Commissioner Bird wanted to come up with some type of <br />reasonable use for the Cook property, considering the mixed <br />zoning that is in the area, and Mr. Zorc again suggested that <br />they be allowed to go at 4 units per acre. <br />Chairman Lyons agreed that Mr. Zorc has pointed out an <br />inconsistency, but he did not believe we could take any action on <br />that today. He asked if we were anywhere near to having an <br />arrangement where the zoning and the site plan can be presented <br />simultaneously, and Attorney Brandenburg advised that the Board <br />currently has that ability under the PRD ordinance (Planned <br />Residential Development); however, developers do not necessarily <br />have to use the PRD to accomplish some things. <br />Commissioner Bowman was concerned about the sewage problems <br />that might result from higher densities. <br />Nancy Cook, applicant, felt that what she and her husband <br />were asking is reasonable, and pointed out that they are <br />considering the neighbors needs with respect to water and sewage. <br />They feel that they can handle these problems and put in some <br />nice facilities there, but they do want to be able to use their <br />property at its highest and best use. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.