My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/1985
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1985
>
5/15/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:51:13 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 10:24:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pip— <br />MAY 15 1985 800K. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we really want to do this, and <br />Director Davis stated that if we don't we will destroy the <br />integrity of our collector system. He emphasized that access is <br />very important. <br />Administrator Wright pointed out that we don't want people <br />backing out on Old Dixie, for example. <br />Commissioner Wodtke wished to know how this relates to how <br />you lay out your lot, and Commissioner.Bird felt there should be <br />a way to have some exceptions - a variance, etc. <br />Chalfrman Lyons felt the functional classification is the <br />clue, and if people are between roads which are the same <br />classification, they have a choice. He then went on to discuss <br />the number of the sections in the ordinance and was concerned <br />that a section might have been lost. <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that two new sections were added <br />in the new material, and one was just deleted - the numbering <br />will be changed accordingly. <br />Attorney Brandenburg had several suggestions re the ordi- <br />nance, as follows: <br />On Page 16, second paragraph - Definitions - which starts <br />out "A non -conformity shall be," he wished to add the following <br />language - " which was lawful prior to the passing of this <br />ordinance or any amendment thereto but which would be prohibited <br />.or further restricted under the terms of this ordinance or any <br />amendment thereto." <br />On Paragraph 5, Page 13, "cubicle" should be "cubic." <br />On Page 14, 25 L. Setback Requirements, first paragraph, <br />last sentence - this should refer to the County's Building Code, <br />and the next paragraph 2. Required Setbacks from Waterbodies <br />the second line should be "or other natural water bodies." <br />The Chairman asked if there were any further questions. <br />Commissioner Wodtke referred to Page 7, 3. Authorized Home <br />Occupations and 4. Non -Authorized Home Occupations and wished to <br />know if any of these are new. <br />30 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.